'Weak' Keir Starmer humiliated live on GB News after brutal Donald Trump snub

Prime Minister Keir Starmer found himself under scrutiny after U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly criticized his handling of the Venezuela situation, calling Starmer “weak.” The remarks came in response to Starmer’s cautious stance following the dramatic capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife by U.S. forces on January 3.

The operation, described as a “large-scale strike” in Caracas, led to Maduro being flown out of Venezuela, sparking a wave of international attention and mixed reactions from world leaders. When asked if he had discussed the attack with Trump, Starmer confirmed that he had not and emphasized that Britain had no involvement in the mission. He made clear that the UK was focusing on the safety of British nationals in Venezuela and working closely with the embassy there.

Starmer’s statement stressed the need to gather facts before reacting: “What I can say is that the UK was not involved in any way in this operation. I want to talk to the president and consult with allies, but first, we need to establish the facts. President Trump is holding a press conference later, which should provide more information.”

Facing pressure from opposition parties, including the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party, to condemn the strike, Starmer remained measured. He said: “I always say and believe we should uphold international law, but in this fast-moving situation, let’s establish the facts and take it from there.”

Commentators highlighted the complexity of the situation, noting that the U.S. had used British military bases to support the seizure of a Venezuelan oil tanker flying the Russian flag, raising questions about Britain’s indirect involvement. During Prime Minister’s Questions, Starmer stated that he had spoken to Trump twice over the Christmas period on security issues but emphasized that there had been no direct engagement about the Maduro operation, a moment that drew audible groans in Parliament.

Analysts interpreted Trump’s reaction as a sign of frustration with Starmer’s approach. Despite the U.K.’s cooperation on certain security matters, Trump apparently did not feel the need to consult directly with Starmer on the Venezuela operation. Observers also pointed to tensions over other international matters, including Greenland and potential involvement in Ukraine, where Starmer’s cautious stance contrasts with Trump’s more aggressive posture.

Critics accused Starmer of being indecisive, trying to balance multiple international relationships without clearly defining his own position. Some commentators described him as trying to appeal to all sides supporting Israel and Gaza simultaneously, maintaining ties with China, courting U.S. approval, and navigating Brexit without showing a firm stance on any particular issue.

The episode has highlighted broader questions about Britain’s role on the world stage and Starmer’s ability to assert leadership in complex international crises, particularly when dealing with allies like the United States.