Incredible map exposes Russia's weakness against America's Tomahawk missiles

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has proposed that the United States supply Tomahawk cruise missiles to European partners so those allies can transfer them to Ukraine. The idea reflects Kyiv’s effort to secure longer-range strike capabilities as it continues resisting Russia’s invasion.

The Trump administration is said to be reviewing a formal Ukrainian request for Tomahawk missiles, Vice President JD Vance told Fox News, noting that Washington is examining several European requests as well. Tomahawk cruise missiles can travel roughly 1,550 miles, a range that would allow Ukrainian forces to reach deep into Russian territory and create new strategic options on the battlefield.

Analysts and news outlets have mapped possible strike envelopes from Kyiv and other launch points to estimate what Russian military and industrial sites could be threatened. Major population centers such as Moscow and St. Petersburg fall within the Tomahawk’s maximum range from several locations inside Ukraine. Key defense production hubs, including aerospace and drone facilities, would also be exposed, potentially disrupting the supply of munitions and components the Russian military relies on.

One reported line of analysis highlights targets in regions such as Tatarstan, where drone production and related industries are concentrated. Other sites identified as consequential include locations tied to missile and artillery production across Russia’s interior. Westward, the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad could be reached from parts of Ukraine, but any operations that route through NATO airspace would be politically sensitive and could provoke broader international tension.

On the battlefield, Russia’s Iskander mobile missile system remains a significant threat to Ukrainian positions. Iskander units, capable of launching ballistic and cruise missiles, are produced in facilities that would likely be within range of Tomahawk strikes. That raises the prospect that long-range precision fires could be used to degrade systems that threaten Ukrainian cities and supply lines.

Separately, U.S. special envoy to Ukraine Keith Kellogg told Fox News that Kyiv now has authorization to conduct long-range strikes into Russian territory, saying Kyiv should “use the ability to strike deep” and that “nothing is off-limits.” If true, that statement signals a major shift in the latitude Ukrainian forces may have for targeting beyond frontline positions.

Any transfer or use of Tomahawk missiles would carry serious strategic and political implications. Supplying such weapons could change the dynamics on the ground by extending Ukraine’s reach, but it would also risk escalation and complicate relations among NATO members and Russia. Debates within Washington and among European capitals are likely to weigh the military advantages against the diplomatic and security risks.

For readers following this development, key search terms to watch include Tomahawk missiles, long-range strike, Zelenskyy proposal, Iskander threat, U.S. review, and Europe transfer. These phrases reflect both the military and geopolitical dimensions of the discussion and can help track new statements, policy decisions, and analysis as the situation evolves.